H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Francisco Gonzalez vs Ross Case H2H: 1-1

Francisco Gonzalez and Ross Case are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 1–0 on grass, while Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1980 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Gonzalez
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ross Case
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ross Case #83 7-6 6-4 6-3 Francisco Gonzalez #92 Match data Jun 25, 1980* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Francisco Gonzalez #94 5-7 3-6 6-2 7-5 6-2 Ross Case #65 Match data Aug 30, 1979* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Gonzalez #997 #40 0 1,758 105 157 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ross Case #758 #24 0 1,962 293 274 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Ross Case
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 3–3 50.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1969 4–4 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 11–8 57.9% — 1,560 0 0
19 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,486 0 0 1971 26–20 56.5% — 1,637 0 0
20 1976 0–3 0.0% #272 1,455 0 0 1972 22–21 51.2% — 1,685 0 0
21 1977 4–6 40.0% #281 1,499 0 0 1973 42–34 55.3% #42 1,811 0 1
22 1978 8–10 44.4% #61 1,602 0 0 1974 42–27 60.9% #29 1,820 0 2
23 1979 21–26 44.7% #77 1,649 0 0 1975 38–21 64.4% #27 1,936 0 4
24 1980 12–20 37.5% #74 1,704 0 0 1976 28–24 53.8% #45 1,837 0 4
25 1981 12–15 44.4% #98 1,659 0 0 1977 21–24 46.7% #48 1,749 0 4
26 1982 14–19 42.4% #100 1,685 0 0 1978 14–19 42.4% #86 1,679 0 4
27 1983 11–16 40.7% #99 1,623 0 0 1979 24–26 48.0% #74 1,676 0 4
28 1984 14–17 45.2% #82 1,654 0 0 1980 11–20 35.5% #163 1,621 0 4
29 1985 9–17 34.6% #140 1,533 0 0 1981 5–15 25.0% — 1,502 0 4
30 1986 0–6 0.0% #548 1,470 0 0 1982 1–5 16.7% — 1,467 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1983 1–3 25.0% #415 1,458 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Ross Case
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
19 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 10 8 18 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — —
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1973 10 5 15 66.7% 17 14 31 54.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 8 12 33.3%
22 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1974 15 13 28 53.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 3 13 76.9%
23 1979 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1975 21 8 29 72.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1980 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 10 10 20 50.0%
25 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 8 13 38.5%
26 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
27 1983 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 5 6 16.7%
28 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1980 2 3 5 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1985 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 1 7 8 12.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1986 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 44 62 106 41.5% 26 43 69 37.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 19 28 47 40.4% — 87 83 170 51.2% 62 66 128 48.4% 103 68 171 60.2% 41 57 98 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Ross Case
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1519 97.0 — — — — — — +27 50.0% -0.57 1–1 — — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1538 111.9 — — — — — — +28 40.0% -0.15 2–0 — — +0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1560 109.1 — — — — — -78 +73 50.0% -0.02 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +2.54
19 1975 1487 102.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–2 — -0.09 1971 1638 118.4 — — — — -15 -130 +69 53.8% +0.08 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) — +3.95
20 1976 1455 101.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 — +0.16 1972 1685 119.5 — — — — +8 -217 +88 53.0% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +2.54
21 1977 1500 113.8 — — — — +54 +17 — 39.1% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.31 1973 1811 144.2 — — — — -4 -97 -10 53.1% +0.25 14–8 (64%) 7–15 (32%) — -2.77
22 1978 1602 128.6 — — — — -59 +21 — 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.22 1974 1820 143.4 — — — — +14 -88 +26 57.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.23
23 1979 1650 132.9 — — — — +20 -50 -143 44.3% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.49 1975 1937 143.0 — — — — +8 -189 -46 59.7% +0.58 15–10 (60%) 11–3 (79%) — +0.72
24 1980 1704 136.2 — — — — +18 -124 -228 40.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.51 1976 1837 150.4 — — — — +17 -79 +82 54.5% +0.20 7–11 (39%) 13–14 (48%) — -3.31
25 1981 1659 126.6 — — — — +2 -100 -75 48.6% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.46 1977 1750 141.1 — — — — +2 — +96 44.0% -0.15 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) — -3.52
26 1982 1686 129.7 — — — — -33 -103 -85 46.4% -0.12 3–7 (30%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.29 1978 1679 126.3 — — — — -11 +32 +126 46.0% -0.43 7–11 (39%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.45
27 1983 1624 126.5 — — — — +5 -83 — 37.7% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.17 1979 1676 135.6 — — — — -77 +31 +155 47.7% -0.18 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.48
28 1984 1655 132.0 — — — — -20 -90 +1 46.9% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.36 1980 1621 128.5 — — — — -49 +77 +125 40.5% -0.63 4–6 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.60
29 1985 1533 120.3 — — — — +42 — +57 39.1% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.77 1981 1503 104.6 — — — — -34 +123 +209 31.4% -1.16 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.19
30 1986 1470 107.8 — — — — +29 — — 13.3% -2.07 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.28 1982 1467 105.7 — — — — +2 — — 25.0% -1.12 1–1 0–2 — +0.37
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1459 103.5 — — — — -6 — — 36.4% -0.82 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.31
Career — 1759 134.8 — — — — +8 -53 -47 42.2% -0.47 34–40 (46%) 53–60 (47%) 102.8 +0.56 — 1962 139.3 — — — — -4 -53 +70 50.7% +0.02 102–88 (54%) 82–91 (47%) 99.4 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.