H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Francisco Gonzalez vs Terry Moor H2H: 0-2

Terry Moor holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Terry Moor leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Terry Moor won the 1985 Chicago round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Gonzalez
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Terry Moor
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Terry Moor #46 4-6 6-3 6-4 Francisco Gonzalez #74 Match data Apr 4, 1985* R32 Chicago ATP 250 Carpet
Terry Moor 1-6 6-3 7-6 Francisco Gonzalez Match data Jul 14, 1976* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Gonzalez #997 #40 0 1,758 105 157 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Terry Moor #554 #32 0 1,924 237 228 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Terry Moor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1976 0–3 0.0% #272 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1977 4–6 40.0% #281 1,499 0 0 1973 1–2 33.3% #180 1,500 0 0
22 1978 8–10 44.4% #61 1,602 0 0 1974 0–3 0.0% #318 1,477 0 0
23 1979 21–26 44.7% #77 1,649 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% #396 1,456 0 0
24 1980 12–20 37.5% #74 1,704 0 0 1976 9–11 45.0% #71 1,576 0 0
25 1981 12–15 44.4% #98 1,659 0 0 1977 29–23 55.8% #53 1,762 0 0
26 1982 14–19 42.4% #100 1,685 0 0 1978 35–32 52.2% #73 1,761 0 0
27 1983 11–16 40.7% #99 1,623 0 0 1979 35–26 57.4% #38 1,821 0 1
28 1984 14–17 45.2% #82 1,654 0 0 1980 34–26 56.7% #53 1,850 0 1
29 1985 9–17 34.6% #140 1,533 0 0 1981 26–25 51.0% #57 1,749 0 1
30 1986 0–6 0.0% #548 1,470 0 0 1982 18–22 45.0% #95 1,697 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1983 8–9 47.1% #100 1,676 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1984 28–19 59.6% #34 1,797 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1985 13–22 37.1% #104 1,617 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 1986 0–5 0.0% #621 1,563 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #552 1,567 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Terry Moor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1979 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1975 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1980 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1976 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 5 7 12 41.7% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 15 10 25 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 14 25 44.0%
27 1983 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 11 6 17 64.7% 20 10 30 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
28 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — 8 10 18 44.4%
29 1985 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3%
30 1986 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 10 22 54.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 18 8 26 69.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 44 62 106 41.5% 26 43 69 37.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 19 28 47 40.4% — 70 65 135 51.9% 96 73 169 56.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 58 76 134 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Terry Moor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1975 1487 102.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–2 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1976 1455 101.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 1500 113.8 — — — — +54 +17 — 39.1% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.31 1973 1500 105.1 — — — — — +51 — 33.3% -1.83 — — — +0.16
22 1978 1602 128.6 — — — — -59 +21 — 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.22 1974 1478 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 0–1 — -0.07
23 1979 1650 132.9 — — — — +20 -50 -143 44.3% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.49 1975 1456 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.22
24 1980 1704 136.2 — — — — +18 -124 -228 40.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.51 1976 1576 124.8 — — — — -56 +37 — 45.1% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.06
25 1981 1659 126.6 — — — — +2 -100 -75 48.6% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.46 1977 1763 137.5 — — — — -165 0 — 55.5% +0.17 7–10 (41%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.54
26 1982 1686 129.7 — — — — -33 -103 -85 46.4% -0.12 3–7 (30%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.29 1978 1762 138.6 — — — — -80 +14 -169 52.5% +0.19 12–10 (55%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.06
27 1983 1624 126.5 — — — — +5 -83 — 37.7% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.17 1979 1821 141.2 — — — — -76 +9 -203 53.2% +0.20 16–7 (70%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.04
28 1984 1655 132.0 — — — — -20 -90 +1 46.9% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.36 1980 1850 149.8 — — — — -13 -29 — 54.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.95
29 1985 1533 120.3 — — — — +42 — +57 39.1% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.77 1981 1750 145.5 — — — — +55 0 — 52.8% +0.02 7–10 (41%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.25
30 1986 1470 107.8 — — — — +29 — — 13.3% -2.07 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.28 1982 1698 143.0 — — — — +39 +23 — 47.5% -0.25 4–9 (31%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.74
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1677 122.3 — — — — +52 +3 — 46.7% -0.24 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1797 137.4 — — — — +23 -106 -150 54.6% +0.27 12–5 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.42
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1617 128.3 — — — — +16 +101 +10 37.8% -0.62 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.73
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1563 106.2 — — — — +28 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.34
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1567 109.4 — — — — +24 — — 37.5% -0.75 1–1 0–1 — -0.33
Career — 1759 134.8 — — — — +8 -53 -47 42.2% -0.47 34–40 (46%) 53–60 (47%) 102.8 +0.56 — 1924 144.4 — — — — -17 +2 -135 50.5% -0.01 83–77 (52%) 76–61 (55%) 103.9 -1.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.