H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francisco Gonzalez vs Tony Roche H2H: 1-0
Francisco Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Tony Roche in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Gonzalez won the 1979 Houston third round 4-6 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1979* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Gonzalez | 4-6 7-6 7-5 | Tony Roche | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony Roche | #166 | #8 | 0 | 2,135 | 360 | 191 | 65.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Gonzalez | Tony Roche | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 53–35 | 60.2% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 86–30 | 74.1% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 55–17 | 76.4% | — | 2,060 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #27 | 1,929 | 0 | 18 |
| 30 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #12 | 1,962 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #50 | 2,016 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #19 | 1,918 | 0 | 20 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #32 | 1,843 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,797 | 0 | 21 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 21 |