H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Franco Davin vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-1
Franco Davin and Jacco Eltingh are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1992 Atlanta third round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1992* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jacco Eltingh | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1989* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 7-5 6-1 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Davin | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |