H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Franco Davin vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 0-1
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Franco Davin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1990 Sao Paulo third round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1990* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jonathan Canter | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Davin | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |