H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Franco Davin vs Libor Pimek H2H: 2-0
Franco Davin holds a 2–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Franco Davin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Franco Davin won the 1988 Kitzbuhel third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1988* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-1 6-3 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1987* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 7-6 3-6 6-4 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Davin | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |