H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Franco Davin vs Mats Wilander H2H: 2-2
Franco Davin and Mats Wilander are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Franco Davin won the 1991 Madrid fourth round 6-3 2-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1991* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-3 2-6 6-0 | Mats Wilander | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1990* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Mats Wilander | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1988* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 6-1 7-6 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1987* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mats Wilander | 6-2 6-2 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Davin | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |