H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Franco Davin vs Paolo Cane H2H: 3-1
Franco Davin holds a 3–1 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Franco Davin leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Franco Davin won the 1992 Bologna fourth round 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1992* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1991* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Davin | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1990* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-3 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1987* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Davin | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |