H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Franco Davin vs Thierry Tulasne H2H: 2-1
Franco Davin holds a 2–1 lead over Thierry Tulasne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Franco Davin leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Franco Davin won the 1990 San Marino fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1990* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Davin | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1990* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thierry Tulasne | 6-3 6-2 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1988* | St. Vincent | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 7-6 7-6 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thierry Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Davin | Thierry Tulasne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 |