H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Franco Squillari vs Gaston Etlis H2H: 0-2
Gaston Etlis holds a 2–0 lead over Franco Squillari in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gaston Etlis leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Etlis won the 2003 Kitzbuhel second round 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2003* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Gaston Etlis | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1997* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gaston Etlis | 6-4 6-4 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Squillari | #1,542 | #11 | 1,670 | 1,846 | 146 | 159 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Gaston Etlis | #1,490 | #114 | 378 | 1,575 | 29 | 54 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Squillari | Gaston Etlis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #328 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #133 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #197 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #132 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #52 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #55 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #168 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #143 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |