H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Franco Squillari vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-2
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 2–1 lead over Franco Squillari in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2002 Munich third round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2002* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2002* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Squillari | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Squillari | #1,542 | #11 | 1,670 | 1,846 | 146 | 159 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Squillari | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #328 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #52 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #55 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2004 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #143 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |