H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Franco Squillari vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 2-2
Franco Squillari and Slava Dosedel are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Franco Squillari won the 2000 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Franco Squillari | 6-4 7-5 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 10, 2000* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Franco Squillari | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 6-2 6-3 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1996* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Squillari | #1,542 | #11 | 1,670 | 1,846 | 146 | 159 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Franco Squillari | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #328 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #52 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #55 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 2004 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #143 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |