H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Franco Squillari vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-1
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Franco Squillari in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1999 Hamburg Masters third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1999* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-3 | Franco Squillari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franco Squillari | #1,542 | #11 | 1,670 | 1,846 | 146 | 159 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Franco Squillari | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #328 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #52 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2000 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #55 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2004 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #143 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |