H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francois Jauffret vs Bob Carmichael H2H: 1-0
Francois Jauffret holds a 1–0 lead over Bob Carmichael in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francois Jauffret leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francois Jauffret won the 1968 Barcelona quarterfinal 7-5 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1968* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Francois Jauffret | 7-5 6-4 6-3 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francois Jauffret | #662 | #20 | 0 | 1,889 | 194 | 131 | 59.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francois Jauffret | Bob Carmichael | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | 1968 | 14–5 | 73.7% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1969 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1972 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1973 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #45 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1974 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1975 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1976 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 1977 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #423 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |