H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Francois Jauffret vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 2-0
Francois Jauffret holds a 2–0 lead over Nikola Pilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francois Jauffret leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Francois Jauffret won the 1976 Munich third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1976* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francois Jauffret | 7-6 6-3 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1975* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francois Jauffret | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francois Jauffret | #662 | #20 | 0 | 1,889 | 194 | 131 | 59.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francois Jauffret | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | 1968 | 14–5 | 73.7% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1969 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1972 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1973 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #45 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1974 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1975 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1976 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1977 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #423 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |