H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Frank Moser vs James Auckland H2H: 0-1

James Auckland holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Moser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, James Auckland leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Auckland won the 2006 Mumbai round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Moser
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
James Auckland
GBR Age 46 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Auckland #414 6-1 6-4 Frank Moser #424 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Mumbai ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Moser #1,156 #288 114 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
James Auckland #1,461 #282 118 1,501 2 1 66.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Moser James Auckland
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
26 2003 0–1 0.0% #411 1,496 0 0 2006 2–1 66.7% #390 1,477 0 0
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #424 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Moser James Auckland
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 2003 1/1 6.0 6.0 46.5% 79.2% 34.4% 50.0% 42.9% 55.3% 32.0% 2006 3/3 11.7 3.0 61.0% 75.7% 58.4% 73.3% 27.4% 68.9% 35.3%
29 2006 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.5% 62.2% 29.4% 42.9% 20.0% 51.9% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2/2 5.5 4.0 57.5% 70.7% 31.9% 46.4% 31.4% 53.6% 31.7% — 3/3 11.7 3.0 61.0% 75.7% 58.4% 73.3% 27.4% 68.9% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Moser James Auckland
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1482 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1470 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1497 100.6 +1.61 -0.98 0.714 44.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.22 2006 1478 107.0 -0.76 +0.33 1.135 52.5% +59 — — 71.4% +1.00 0–1 2–0 — +0.25
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1486 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1482 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1464 96.1 -1.48 +0.94 0.654 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1450 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1440 92.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1450 96.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1434 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1465 107.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1432 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1397 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1379 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1378 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2016 1391 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2017 1380 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1500 95.5 +0.07 -0.02 0.683 43.1% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +4.00 — 1502 102.5 -0.76 +0.33 1.135 52.5% +59 — — 71.4% +1.00 0–1 2–0 — +8.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.