H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Frantisek Cermak vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Frantisek Cermak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 2003 Libéma Open round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frantisek Cermak
CZE Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
John Van Lottum
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-4 6-3 Frantisek Cermak #362 Match data Jun 20, 2003* R16 Libéma Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frantisek Cermak #1,131 #201 180 1,567 9 15 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Van Lottum — — — 1,719 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frantisek Cermak John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
24 2001 0–1 0.0% #367 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2003 5–7 41.7% #215 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #367 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 2–2 50.0% #461 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2006 1–1 50.0% #694 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 0–2 0.0% #684 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frantisek Cermak John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frantisek Cermak John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2001 1/1 2.0 3.0 68.6% 58.3% 36.4% 50.0% 100.0% 51.4% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 12/12 3.1 2.0 58.5% 66.4% 49.1% 49.6% 52.1% 58.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 3/3 5.0 3.3 63.0% 72.7% 47.1% 40.8% 28.2% 63.2% 35.3% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 2005 4/4 4.3 5.0 60.8% 70.6% 46.9% 74.6% 41.6% 61.2% 39.6% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 2006 2/2 3.5 5.0 52.8% 58.2% 44.1% 27.8% 25.0% 51.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%
33 2010 2/2 1.5 6.0 50.0% 63.1% 37.5% 52.1% 50.0% 48.1% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frantisek Cermak John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1491 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.35
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1631 121.6 — — — — -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1612 120.7 — — — — -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 2000 1491 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1662 128.3 — — — — +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 2001 1459 97.6 +0.67 -0.76 0.824 47.3% — — — — — — — — -0.06 2000 1517 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1584 111.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 — -0.48
26 2003 1500 112.1 -1.87 +0.62 0.970 49.6% — +57 — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -0.08 2002 1624 118.0 — — — — -2 -68 — 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 — +0.19
27 2004 1480 100.0 -1.01 -3.47 0.958 49.0% — +70 — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 2005 1498 107.4 +0.14 +1.24 1.022 50.6% — +70 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 0–2 — -0.16 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 2006 1511 104.1 -1.92 -0.20 0.737 43.4% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1497 113.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
31 2008 1469 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1508 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1552 98.3 -2.77 -2.45 0.526 38.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1481 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1489 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1454 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1428 91.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1406 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1567 103.4 -1.40 -0.17 0.902 48.1% — +63 — 39.2% -0.59 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.8 +0.29 — 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.