H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Frantisek Cermak vs Takao Suzuki

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frantisek Cermak vs Takao Suzuki.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frantisek Cermak
CZE Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #137 7-5 4-6 8-6 Frantisek Cermak #250 Match data Jan 13, 2003 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frantisek Cermak #1,131 #201 180 1,567 9 15 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frantisek Cermak Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 2001 0–1 0.0% #367 1,458 0 0 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2003 5–7 41.7% #215 1,499 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #367 1,480 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2005 2–2 50.0% #461 1,497 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2006 1–1 50.0% #694 1,510 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0
33 2010 0–2 0.0% #684 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frantisek Cermak Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frantisek Cermak Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2001 1/1 2.0 3.0 68.6% 58.3% 36.4% 50.0% 100.0% 51.4% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 12/12 3.1 2.0 58.5% 66.4% 49.1% 49.6% 52.1% 58.6% 40.2% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2004 3/3 5.0 3.3 63.0% 72.7% 47.1% 40.8% 28.2% 63.2% 35.3% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2005 4/4 4.3 5.0 60.8% 70.6% 46.9% 74.6% 41.6% 61.2% 39.6% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2006 2/2 3.5 5.0 52.8% 58.2% 44.1% 27.8% 25.0% 51.5% 35.7% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
33 2010 2/2 1.5 6.0 50.0% 63.1% 37.5% 52.1% 50.0% 48.1% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24/24 3.4 3.3 58.7% 66.6% 46.5% 51.1% 46.9% 57.8% 38.0% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frantisek Cermak Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.13
23 2000 1491 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 2001 1459 97.6 +0.67 -0.76 0.824 47.3% — — — — — — — — -0.06 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 2003 1500 112.1 -1.87 +0.62 0.970 49.6% — +57 — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 2004 1480 100.0 -1.01 -3.47 0.958 49.0% — +70 — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 2005 1498 107.4 +0.14 +1.24 1.022 50.6% — +70 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 0–2 — -0.16 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2006 1511 104.1 -1.92 -0.20 0.737 43.4% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — -0.08 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.05
30 2007 1497 113.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2008 1469 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2009 1508 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 2010 1552 98.3 -2.77 -2.45 0.526 38.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.26 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1481 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1489 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1454 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1428 91.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1406 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1567 103.4 -1.40 -0.17 0.902 48.1% — +63 — 39.2% -0.59 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.8 +0.29 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.