H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Frederic Niemeyer vs Marcos Ondruska

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frederic Niemeyer vs Marcos Ondruska.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frederic Niemeyer
CAN Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Marcos Ondruska
RSA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Ondruska #185 6-4 6-1 Frederic Niemeyer #315 Match data Jun 26, 2001* Q2 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frederic Niemeyer #548 #134 273 1,528 4 21 16.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marcos Ondruska #1,352 #27 1,007 1,786 106 138 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frederic Niemeyer Marcos Ondruska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 3–3 50.0% #256 1,537 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–5 37.5% #137 1,589 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 11–10 52.4% #67 1,640 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 26–29 47.3% #47 1,568 0 0
21 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1994 15–17 46.9% #98 1,686 0 0
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #421 1,471 0 0 1995 16–19 45.7% #114 1,665 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #229 1,467 0 0 1996 17–20 45.9% #102 1,675 0 0
24 2000 0–1 0.0% #354 1,439 0 0 1997 12–16 42.9% #113 1,656 0 0
25 2001 0–1 0.0% #239 1,451 0 0 1998 2–10 16.7% #142 1,541 0 0
26 2002 0–1 0.0% #262 1,415 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #159 1,520 0 0
27 2003 1–4 20.0% #170 1,484 0 0 2000 0–5 0.0% #204 1,477 0 0
28 2004 2–4 33.3% #295 1,465 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #263 1,569 0 0
29 2005 0–2 0.0% #176 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 0–1 0.0% #172 1,427 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #334 1,451 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–1 50.0% #415 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frederic Niemeyer Marcos Ondruska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
21 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 6 10 16 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2004 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 3 19 22 13.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — 66 81 147 44.9% 25 30 55 45.5% 11 16 27 40.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 23/25 of Frederic Niemeyer's and 206/238 of Marcos Ondruska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frederic Niemeyer Marcos Ondruska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 6/8 0.8 1.2 60.4% 61.6% 45.5% 53.7% 54.4% 53.8% 38.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 18/21 1.6 2.1 63.0% 62.9% 49.3% 50.1% 45.0% 57.6% 45.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 52/55 2.1 3.6 58.9% 64.5% 48.0% 56.6% 45.3% 57.6% 41.2%
21 1997 1/1 10.0 11.0 47.4% 75.7% 34.1% 62.5% 50.0% 53.8% 35.3% 1994 28/32 2.9 3.9 55.5% 68.3% 46.4% 53.4% 52.7% 58.4% 41.4%
22 1998 1/1 12.0 7.0 48.4% 83.3% 46.9% 66.7% — 64.5% 20.8% 1995 35/35 3.6 3.8 55.6% 69.3% 45.9% 59.4% 50.1% 59.1% 39.7%
23 1999 1/1 14.0 4.0 58.5% 81.6% 48.1% 33.3% 33.3% 67.7% 25.4% 1996 28/37 3.4 2.9 60.1% 67.6% 48.4% 47.7% 41.6% 59.6% 39.7%
24 2000 1/1 19.0 16.0 52.5% 90.4% 40.4% 57.1% 0.0% 66.7% 25.0% 1997 24/28 3.5 4.5 56.5% 66.3% 44.2% 53.2% 41.3% 56.8% 36.8%
25 2001 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 60.6% 60.6% 0.0% 18.2% 60.6% 33.8% 1998 8/12 3.0 3.4 59.1% 63.2% 40.3% 66.6% 47.6% 53.8% 34.1%
26 2002 1/1 9.0 6.0 48.3% 75.0% 43.3% 62.5% 0.0% 58.6% 26.4% 1999 2/2 1.5 6.5 59.5% 59.5% 38.3% 55.0% 21.4% 51.9% 34.5%
27 2003 5/5 18.4 10.6 53.4% 78.4% 43.3% 61.0% 23.3% 62.1% 29.5% 2000 3/5 4.0 5.7 59.6% 66.5% 39.8% 49.2% 20.0% 56.0% 31.2%
28 2004 5/6 16.6 6.2 58.2% 80.5% 50.5% 73.9% 57.5% 67.7% 36.8% 2001 2/3 4.0 8.0 58.1% 67.0% 49.1% 53.5% 35.8% 59.5% 36.8%
29 2005 2/2 4.0 3.5 49.5% 61.0% 39.6% 43.8% 20.0% 50.5% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1/1 7.0 6.0 52.9% 81.5% 29.2% 0.0% — 56.9% 12.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2/3 6.5 1.5 63.6% 58.8% 47.1% 52.8% 0.0% 54.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 2/2 6.5 4.0 55.7% 78.4% 52.6% 81.7% 40.0% 66.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23/25 12.3 6.7 54.5% 75.6% 45.7% 57.1% 27.2% 61.8% 30.7% — 206/244 2.8 3.6 58.2% 66.2% 46.6% 54.6% 45.8% 57.8% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frederic Niemeyer Marcos Ondruska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1537 111.9 — — — — +45 — — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1589 127.8 -3.07 +0.45 0.825 46.5% -15 +24 — 40.0% -0.60 1–1 0–1 — -0.46
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1641 118.5 -2.04 +3.41 1.062 51.0% -37 +25 — 50.0% +0.14 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +1.64
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1568 136.6 -2.53 +2.02 0.972 49.6% +55 +92 +20 49.3% -0.07 7–11 (39%) 5–5 (50%) 96.4 +1.65
21 1997 1488 101.7 -2.64 +2.02 0.765 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.15 1994 1687 133.1 -1.29 +1.94 0.994 50.0% -8 -54 -101 51.1% +0.02 6–10 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 97.5 -0.64
22 1998 1472 97.9 +0.47 -1.34 0.585 44.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.30 1995 1666 131.0 -2.18 +1.47 0.970 49.6% +20 -47 -65 46.9% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 4–9 (31%) 98.1 -0.51
23 1999 1468 105.9 +2.66 -0.81 0.786 46.9% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 1996 1675 135.7 -1.48 +1.63 0.982 49.3% +38 -128 -51 45.8% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 97.4 -1.02
24 2000 1440 97.3 -2.35 +1.89 0.750 47.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.06 1997 1656 124.4 -3.01 -0.51 0.853 47.2% +1 -41 -28 38.0% -0.69 7–2 (78%) 4–7 (36%) 106.2 -0.01
25 2001 1451 103.4 -3.25 +4.66 0.858 46.4% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.05 1998 1541 113.3 -3.51 -1.85 0.737 44.6% +23 — — 23.3% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +0.28
26 2002 1415 100.9 -0.87 +1.68 0.638 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 1999 1520 102.7 -1.06 +2.09 0.716 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — — — -0.12
27 2003 1484 113.2 +1.13 -0.62 0.779 45.9% — — +92 37.5% -0.94 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.38 2000 1477 113.2 -2.58 +2.02 0.709 43.5% +31 — — 16.7% -2.50 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.49
28 2004 1465 110.8 +1.18 -1.31 1.137 51.9% -36 — — 46.7% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.23 2001 1569 114.2 -1.90 +4.79 0.909 48.2% — — — 33.3% -1.83 1–0 1–1 — -0.37
29 2005 1456 107.2 +0.13 +0.09 0.683 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1434 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1428 109.7 -1.48 +1.06 0.283 37.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1452 109.5 +0.03 +0.47 0.650 40.9% +6 — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1493 119.1 +1.31 +2.10 1.053 51.9% — — — 50.0% +1.00 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1528 113.8 +0.31 +0.21 0.805 46.5% -22 — +92 28.8% -1.20 0–7 (0%) 4–6 (40%) 93.0 -0.12 — 1786 135.2 -2.21 +1.52 0.947 49.0% +19 +16 -37 44.4% -0.33 41–43 (49%) 33–44 (43%) 97.0 +0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.