H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Frew Mcmillan vs Dick Crealy H2H: 0-3
Dick Crealy holds a 3–0 lead over Frew Mcmillan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dick Crealy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dick Crealy won the 1976 Philadelphia Wct second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 84
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1976* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Dick Crealy | 6-2 6-4 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1971* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Dick Crealy | 5-7 7-6 6-1 6-2 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1969* | Durban | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dick Crealy | 8-10 6-4 6-1 9-7 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frew Mcmillan | #747 | #39 | 0 | 1,803 | 201 | 247 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frew Mcmillan | Dick Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1968 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1969 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1970 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–32 | 30.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1972 | 31–26 | 54.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1973 | 25–36 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1975 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1978 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |