H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Frew Mcmillan vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-2
Frew Mcmillan and Ion Tiriac are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 2–1 on clay, while Frew Mcmillan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frew Mcmillan won the 1978 Johannesburg fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 84
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1978* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Frew Mcmillan | 6-2 6-2 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1975* | Bermuda | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Frew Mcmillan | 6-4 7-6 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1970* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-1 6-4 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| May 8, 1968* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frew Mcmillan | #747 | #39 | 0 | 1,803 | 201 | 247 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frew Mcmillan | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | 1968 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1969 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1970 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–32 | 30.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1972 | 31–26 | 54.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1973 | 25–36 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1975 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1978 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |