H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Frew Mcmillan vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 1-3
Ken Rosewall holds a 3–1 lead over Frew Mcmillan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Frew Mcmillan won the 1971 Wembley third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 84
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1971* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Frew Mcmillan | 6-4 6-2 | Ken Rosewall | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1971* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1971* | Louisville Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 6-2 7-5 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| May 4, 1971* | Dallas Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ken Rosewall | 6-0 6-0 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frew Mcmillan | #747 | #39 | 0 | 1,803 | 201 | 247 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frew Mcmillan | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | 1968 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1969 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1970 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–32 | 30.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1972 | 31–26 | 54.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1973 | 25–36 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1975 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | 1978 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |