H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Frew Mcmillan vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 1-0
Frew Mcmillan holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frew Mcmillan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Frew Mcmillan won the 1972 Cincinnati fourth round 7-6 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 84
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1972* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Frew Mcmillan | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frew Mcmillan | #747 | #39 | 0 | 1,803 | 201 | 247 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frew Mcmillan | Patrick Proisy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1968 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1969 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1970 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–32 | 30.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1972 | 31–26 | 54.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1973 | 25–36 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1975 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |