H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
G. Connell vs C. Bergstrom H2H: 1-0
G. Connell holds a 1–0 lead over C. Bergstrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, G. Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, G. Connell won the 1988 US Open first round 3-6 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | G. Connell | 3-6 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-4 | C. Bergstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C. Bergstrom | #1,327 | #32 | 876 | 1,867 | 159 | 164 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | G. Connell | C. Bergstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #410 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #69 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #106 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #80 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #112 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #259 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |