H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
G. Connell vs D. Rostagno H2H: 2-2
G. Connell and D. Rostagno are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, G. Connell leads 2–0 on hard courts, while D. Rostagno leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, D. Rostagno won the 1995 Queen's Club second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1995* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | D. Rostagno | 6-4 6-2 | G. Connell | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1990* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | D. Rostagno | 7-6 6-4 | G. Connell | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1990* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | G. Connell | 6-4 (ret.) | D. Rostagno | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1988* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | G. Connell | 6-4 6-4 | D. Rostagno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Rostagno | #1,316 | #13 | 1,392 | 1,920 | 192 | 180 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | G. Connell | D. Rostagno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #428 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #89 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #111 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #486 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |