H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
G. Connell vs J. Lozano H2H: 0-2
J. Lozano holds a 2–0 lead over G. Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, J. Lozano leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, J. Lozano won the 1988 Washington third round 4-6 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 63
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1988* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | J. Lozano | 4-6 6-1 7-6 | G. Connell | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1988* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | J. Lozano | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | G. Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| J. Lozano | #804 | #51 | 98 | 1,655 | 20 | 42 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | G. Connell | J. Lozano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #829 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |