H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 07:16 UTC
Gael Monfils vs Albert Portas H2H: 0-1
Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2006 Estoril fourth round 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2006* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gael Monfils | #325 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,151 | 569 | 356 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gael Monfils | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #14 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,062 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #7 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,920 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,934 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #21 | 1,910 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,934 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,925 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #55 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,771 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #325 | 1,685 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |