H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gael Monfils vs David Nalbandian H2H: 1-1
Gael Monfils and David Nalbandian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay, while Gael Monfils leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2008 US Open third round 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 7-6(5) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gael Monfils | #325 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,151 | 569 | 356 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gael Monfils | David Nalbandian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #14 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,062 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2016 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #7 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,920 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,934 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #21 | 1,910 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,934 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,925 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #55 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,771 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #325 | 1,685 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |