H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gael Monfils vs John Isner H2H: 7-6
Gael Monfils holds a 7–6 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Gael Monfils leads 7–6 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2021 Canada Masters quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
7
–
6
13 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2021* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2019* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2018* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-4 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 7-5 | John Isner | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2017* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-2 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-4 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 7-5 6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2011* | Washington | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | John Isner | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2010* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Gael Monfils | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 6-1 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 6-7(8) 6-3 6-3 | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2007* | Washington | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | John Isner | 6-7(4) 7-6(1) 7-6(2) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gael Monfils | #325 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,151 | 569 | 356 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gael Monfils | John Isner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #14 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,062 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2016 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #7 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,920 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,934 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #21 | 1,910 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,934 | 0 | 11 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,925 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 |
| 37 | 2024 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #55 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,771 | 0 | 13 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 |
| 39 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #325 | 1,685 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |