H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 4-1

Gael Monfils holds a 4–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Gael Monfils leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2019 Dubai fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 39 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2019* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Gael Monfils #23 6-3 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #128 Match data
Sep 6, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Gael Monfils #12 6-3 6-2 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data
Aug 17, 2016* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Gael Monfils #11 7-5 6-0 Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Gael Monfils #59 7-6(5) 6-2 2-6 6-0 Marcos Baghdatis #11 Match data
Aug 17, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #10 7-6(8) 2-6 6-1 Gael Monfils #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gael Monfils #325 #6 3,815 2,151 569 356 61.5% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,781 0 1 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2008 27–16 62.8% #14 1,933 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 1,994 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,062 0 3 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 1,996 0 4 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,936 0 4 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,929 0 4 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,054 0 5 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,951 0 5 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2016 40–17 70.2% #7 2,052 0 6 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,966 0 6 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,921 0 7 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,920 0 8 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,934 0 10 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2021 19–16 54.3% #21 1,910 0 10 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,934 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,925 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2024 25–21 54.3% #55 1,895 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,771 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 3–7 30.0% #325 1,685 0 13 — — — — — — —