H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Marin Cilic H2H: 3-0

Gael Monfils holds a 3–0 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gael Monfils leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2019 Dubai third round 6-3 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 39 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2019* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Gael Monfils #23 6-3 4-6 6-0 Marin Cilic #10 Match data
Feb 23, 2018* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R16 Clay Gael Monfils #39 6-3 7-6(8) Marin Cilic #3 Match data
Nov 14, 2009* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Gael Monfils #16 3-6 6-4 6-4 Marin Cilic #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gael Monfils #325 #6 3,815 2,151 569 356 61.5% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,753 0 1 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,781 0 1 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3
21 2008 27–16 62.8% #14 1,933 0 1 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 1,994 0 2 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,062 0 3 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 1,996 0 4 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,936 0 4 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,929 0 4 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,054 0 5 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,951 0 5 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 2016 40–17 70.2% #7 2,052 0 6 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,966 0 6 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,921 0 7 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,920 0 8 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,934 0 10 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20
34 2021 19–16 54.3% #21 1,910 0 10 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,934 0 11 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,925 0 12 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 2024 25–21 54.3% #55 1,895 0 12 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,771 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 3–7 30.0% #325 1,685 0 13 — — — — — — —