H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Gael Monfils vs Mate Pavic H2H: 1-0
Gael Monfils holds a 1–0 lead over Mate Pavic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gael Monfils leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2013 Umag third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 33
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2013* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gael Monfils | 7-5 6-2 | Mate Pavic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gael Monfils | #325 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,151 | 569 | 356 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| Mate Pavic | #974 | #295 | 150 | 1,611 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gael Monfils | Mate Pavic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #369 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #14 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #638 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,062 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #933 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #7 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,920 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,934 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #21 | 1,910 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,934 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,925 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #55 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,771 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #325 | 1,685 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |