H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-3

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 3–1 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Gael Monfils leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2015 Bucharest fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 39 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 24, 2015* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Gael Monfils #15 6-1 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #57 Match data
Feb 13, 2010* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #20 5-7 6-2 6-3 Gael Monfils #13 Match data
Jan 5, 2007* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #24 6-4 6-2 Gael Monfils #46 Match data
Aug 20, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #26 4-6 6-1 6-1 Gael Monfils #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gael Monfils #325 #6 3,815 2,151 569 356 61.5% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,753 0 1 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,781 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2008 27–16 62.8% #14 1,933 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 1,994 0 2 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,062 0 3 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 1,996 0 4 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,936 0 4 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,929 0 4 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,054 0 5 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,951 0 5 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2016 40–17 70.2% #7 2,052 0 6 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,966 0 6 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,921 0 7 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,920 0 8 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,934 0 10 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2021 19–16 54.3% #21 1,910 0 10 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,934 0 11 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,925 0 12 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10
37 2024 25–21 54.3% #55 1,895 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,771 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 3–7 30.0% #325 1,685 0 13 — — — — — — —