H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 2-3

Nicolas Almagro holds a 3–2 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–0 on clay, while Gael Monfils leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2016 US Open third round 6-4 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 39 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 4, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Gael Monfils #69 6-4 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #48 Match data
Apr 12, 2013* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #12 2-6 6-0 6-3 Gael Monfils #103 Match data
Mar 1, 2009* Acapulco ATP 500 F Clay Nicolas Almagro #21 6-4 6-4 Gael Monfils #10 Match data
Jan 25, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Gael Monfils #13 6-4 6-3 7-5 Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data
Apr 27, 2006* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #57 6-2 6-4 Gael Monfils #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gael Monfils #325 #6 3,815 2,151 569 356 61.5% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,753 0 1 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,781 0 1 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2008 27–16 62.8% #14 1,933 0 1 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 1,994 0 2 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,062 0 3 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 1,996 0 4 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,936 0 4 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,929 0 4 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,054 0 5 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,951 0 5 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2016 40–17 70.2% #7 2,052 0 6 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,966 0 6 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,921 0 7 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,920 0 8 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,934 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2021 19–16 54.3% #21 1,910 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,934 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,925 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2024 25–21 54.3% #55 1,895 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,771 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 3–7 30.0% #325 1,685 0 13 — — — — — — —