H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 4-0

Gael Monfils holds a 4–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gael Monfils leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2018 Wimbledon second round 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gael Monfils #44 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Paolo Lorenzi #86 Match data Jul 5, 2018* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Gael Monfils #46 6-3 3-6 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #43 Match data Jan 3, 2018* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Gael Monfils #16 6-2 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #53 Match data Apr 13, 2016* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Gael Monfils #21 6-4 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #71 Match data Oct 23, 2015* R16 Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gael Monfils #311 #6 3,815 2,169 576 362 61.4% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Paolo Lorenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,754 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,782 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2008 30–17 63.8% #14 1,953 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 2,006 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,066 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 2,002 0 4 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,938 0 4 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,930 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,056 0 5 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,952 0 5 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0
29 2016 43–18 70.5% #7 2,067 0 6 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,970 0 6 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,919 0 7 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,925 0 8 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,937 0 10 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0
34 2021 19–17 52.8% #21 1,895 0 10 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,927 0 11 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,927 0 12 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1
37 2024 25–22 53.2% #55 1,904 0 12 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,773 0 13 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1
39 2026 4–9 30.8% #311 1,682 0 13 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gael Monfils Paolo Lorenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 12 10 22 54.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 18 11 29 62.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 33 15 48 68.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 32 13 45 71.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 22 9 31 71.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2013 16 12 28 57.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 23 10 33 69.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 15 10 25 60.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2016 37 14 51 72.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2017 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2018 15 8 23 65.2% 10 10 20 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2019 30 13 43 69.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2020 15 3 18 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 2022 13 6 19 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
36 2023 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 2024 17 14 31 54.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 2025 14 9 23 60.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 388 217 605 64.1% 135 104 239 56.5% 47 37 84 56.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 916/939 of Gael Monfils's and 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gael Monfils Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 5/5 8.6 4.6 50.1% 73.2% 42.1% 59.4% 52.9% 57.7% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 47/47 7.9 3.2 53.5% 72.4% 45.6% 53.3% 44.7% 60.2% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 39/39 6.5 4.0 57.1% 69.6% 49.5% 51.5% 48.3% 60.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 42/42 11.3 3.8 56.8% 74.7% 51.9% 56.5% 41.4% 64.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 43/47 7.3 3.2 61.0% 73.5% 48.9% 55.8% 43.6% 63.9% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 60/61 9.2 2.3 62.4% 75.9% 50.2% 64.1% 44.6% 66.1% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 61/61 9.3 3.7 63.1% 72.7% 51.7% 55.6% 42.5% 64.6% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 53/54 7.8 3.6 63.9% 73.1% 50.9% 60.4% 42.6% 65.1% 38.9% 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0%
25 2012 28/28 7.1 4.3 64.4% 72.1% 47.2% 56.4% 48.2% 62.6% 39.0% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5%
26 2013 55/55 7.7 3.7 66.0% 71.4% 48.6% 61.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 47/47 8.6 4.1 64.7% 74.7% 50.5% 56.6% 41.9% 66.2% 40.1% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9%
28 2015 51/51 8.9 3.0 64.2% 73.5% 52.3% 70.1% 42.6% 65.9% 38.1% 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2%
29 2016 56/61 8.2 2.9 64.2% 75.6% 53.1% 55.6% 50.1% 67.3% 40.4% 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6%
30 2017 34/34 9.1 4.0 62.8% 72.9% 50.7% 59.3% 42.7% 64.8% 38.9% 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1%
31 2018 48/50 7.8 4.4 66.5% 70.8% 49.9% 58.4% 48.9% 63.4% 36.9% 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2%
32 2019 55/57 6.8 4.0 65.1% 72.1% 51.4% 62.8% 42.0% 64.6% 39.4% 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9%
33 2020 21/21 6.3 3.7 67.2% 70.5% 49.2% 54.1% 44.1% 63.9% 40.1% 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0%
34 2021 33/36 9.6 5.0 61.5% 75.8% 48.7% 58.1% 37.5% 65.3% 38.7% 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0%
35 2022 21/21 7.4 3.5 60.5% 75.0% 51.7% 57.6% 43.1% 65.7% 39.2% 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9%
36 2023 26/27 7.9 4.8 58.5% 75.2% 48.5% 64.3% 50.2% 64.2% 37.0% 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1%
37 2024 45/47 9.0 4.2 60.2% 74.2% 51.2% 58.8% 38.3% 65.1% 35.1% 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6%
38 2025 33/34 9.9 5.6 60.2% 75.5% 48.7% 58.2% 39.6% 64.8% 35.5% 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4%
39 2026 13/14 8.6 5.0 58.5% 73.5% 43.5% 62.0% 36.8% 60.7% 37.9% 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6%
Career — 916/939 8.3 3.8 62.1% 73.4% 50.1% 58.8% 43.6% 64.4% 38.2% — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gael Monfils Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1541 108.8 -0.58 +0.57 0.922 48.3% +29 — — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 0–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1755 136.3 -0.97 +1.08 0.975 49.4% -9 -156 -166 51.7% -0.20 8–7 (53%) 11–4 (73%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1721 133.5 -0.81 +2.04 0.999 50.1% -49 -25 -128 51.0% +0.16 6–4 (60%) 9–11 (45%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1782 136.7 +1.42 -0.82 0.994 49.6% -153 +65 -178 54.1% +0.14 3–9 (25%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1953 154.2 +0.73 +2.37 1.040 50.5% -67 -7 -277 60.3% +0.51 8–1 (89%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 2007 158.5 +2.40 +2.01 1.113 51.9% -18 -3 — 66.2% +0.91 11–6 (65%) 14–8 (64%) — +2.24 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 2066 159.3 +1.36 +1.81 1.073 51.1% +36 -91 -319 62.1% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 17–15 (53%) — +2.34 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 2002 157.4 +2.10 +1.95 1.116 51.8% +50 +13 -191 64.0% +0.69 10–6 (63%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.42 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08
25 2012 1939 150.3 +0.17 +1.43 1.041 50.6% +63 +20 — 60.9% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.02 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
26 2013 1931 160.1 +0.59 +2.40 1.070 51.0% +14 +50 -85 59.3% +0.57 10–9 (53%) 13–13 (50%) — -2.90 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 2056 169.1 +2.56 +3.83 1.185 52.6% +23 -15 -229 68.8% +0.98 5–8 (38%) 12–6 (67%) — -2.40 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
28 2015 1952 158.7 +2.29 +1.91 1.117 51.9% +17 +137 -63 63.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 18–10 (64%) — +1.11 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.07
29 2016 2067 172.6 +3.30 +4.82 1.234 53.6% +18 +2 — 70.7% +1.23 6–8 (43%) 13–9 (59%) — +4.14 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
30 2017 1970 155.7 +1.37 +2.55 1.105 51.7% +56 +25 -100 60.2% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.21 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.29
31 2018 1919 155.3 -0.44 +1.41 1.011 50.2% +63 +5 +33 60.0% +0.50 11–10 (52%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.37 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.92
32 2019 1926 160.8 +0.66 +3.33 1.112 52.2% +53 -1 -70 62.5% +0.96 16–6 (73%) 13–15 (46%) — +2.98 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.70
33 2020 1937 153.8 +0.85 +2.39 1.109 52.2% +115 -125 — 71.4% +1.27 1–1 5–1 (83%) — +1.00 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.18
34 2021 1896 147.8 +1.89 +1.74 1.115 51.6% +97 -123 -123 54.7% +0.32 4–8 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.47 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) — +1.05
35 2022 1927 151.1 +2.06 +2.54 1.144 52.4% +36 — — 72.3% +1.43 2–1 (67%) 6–0 (100%) — +1.36 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) — +2.90
36 2023 1928 151.8 +0.57 +1.80 1.035 50.5% +27 -154 — 58.2% +0.30 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.99 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.77
37 2024 1904 154.2 +1.42 -0.11 1.005 50.2% +38 -180 -35 52.8% +0.20 9–9 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.36 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.08
38 2025 1773 144.0 +0.03 -0.16 1.006 50.2% +87 -34 +34 52.0% +0.23 10–7 (59%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.00 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68
39 2026 1683 128.7 -2.22 +0.70 0.965 49.8% +92 +5 — 41.7% -0.42 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.27 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
Career — 2169 163.2 +1.14 +1.96 1.074 51.2% +25 -8 -117 60.4% +0.58 165–138 (54%) 232–176 (57%) 104.0 +0.50 — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.