H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 11-7

Gael Monfils holds an 11–7 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Gael Monfils leads 7–6 on hard courts and 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Gael Monfils won the 2020 Dubai Tennis Championships quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
11 – 7
18 main draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gael Monfils #9 6-3 6-3 Richard Gasquet #56 Match data Feb 28, 2020* QF Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Gael Monfils #44 7-6(6) 7-5 6-4 Richard Gasquet #31 Match data Jul 4, 2018* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Gael Monfils #16 6-2 6-7(7) 7-6(4) Richard Gasquet #27 Match data Jul 1, 2017* SF Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gasquet #30 3-6 6-4 6-3 Gael Monfils #16 Match data Jun 22, 2017* R32 Halle Open ATP 500 Grass
Gael Monfils #16 7-6(5) 5-7 4-3 (ret.) Richard Gasquet #25 Match data Jun 3, 2017* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Richard Gasquet #19 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 Gael Monfils #12 Match data Feb 25, 2017* QF Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #28 6-4 6-3 Gael Monfils #20 Match data Feb 7, 2015* SF Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard
Gael Monfils #24 6-4 6-2 6-2 Richard Gasquet #14 Match data Aug 31, 2014* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Gael Monfils #30 6-4 6-4 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data Feb 9, 2014* F Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard
Gael Monfils #31 6-2 7-5 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data Jan 2, 2014* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #10 6-3 2-6 6-3 Gael Monfils #108 Match data Feb 8, 2013* R16 Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard
Gael Monfils #9 6-4 7-6(7) Richard Gasquet #17 Match data Apr 22, 2011* R16 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Richard Gasquet #31 6-4 3-6 6-4 Gael Monfils #14 Match data Oct 13, 2010* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Gael Monfils #19 6-4 7-5 7-5 Richard Gasquet #38 Match data Sep 7, 2010* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Gael Monfils #13 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #47 Match data Sep 26, 2009* SF Metz ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #17 6-0 4-6 7-5 6-3 Gael Monfils #59 Match data Jan 21, 2007* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Gael Monfils #45 7-6(3) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #12 Match data Oct 8, 2005* QF Metz ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #151 7-5 6-1 Gael Monfils #368 Match data Oct 16, 2004* QF Metz International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gael Monfils #311 #6 3,815 2,169 576 362 61.4% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,754 0 1 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,782 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2008 30–17 63.8% #14 1,953 0 1 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 2,006 0 2 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,066 0 3 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 2,002 0 4 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,938 0 4 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,930 0 4 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,056 0 5 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,952 0 5 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 2016 43–18 70.5% #7 2,067 0 6 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,970 0 6 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,919 0 7 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,925 0 8 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,937 0 10 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 2021 19–17 52.8% #21 1,895 0 10 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,927 0 11 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,927 0 12 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 2024 25–22 53.2% #55 1,904 0 12 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,773 0 13 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 2026 4–9 30.8% #311 1,682 0 13 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gael Monfils Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2004 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 12 10 22 54.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2008 18 11 29 62.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 33 15 48 68.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 32 13 45 71.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 22 9 31 71.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2013 16 12 28 57.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2014 23 10 33 69.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2015 15 10 25 60.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2016 37 14 51 72.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2017 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2018 15 8 23 65.2% 10 10 20 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 2019 30 13 43 69.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2020 15 3 18 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2022 13 6 19 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 2023 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 2024 17 14 31 54.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 2025 14 9 23 60.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 388 217 605 64.1% 135 104 239 56.5% 47 37 84 56.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 916/939 of Gael Monfils's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gael Monfils Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 2004 5/5 8.6 4.6 50.1% 73.2% 42.1% 59.4% 52.9% 57.7% 39.0% 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 2005 47/47 7.9 3.2 53.5% 72.4% 45.6% 53.3% 44.7% 60.2% 38.9% 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 2006 39/39 6.5 4.0 57.1% 69.6% 49.5% 51.5% 48.3% 60.9% 39.1% 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2007 42/42 11.3 3.8 56.8% 74.7% 51.9% 56.5% 41.4% 64.6% 35.1% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2008 43/47 7.3 3.2 61.0% 73.5% 48.9% 55.8% 43.6% 63.9% 37.6% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2009 60/61 9.2 2.3 62.4% 75.9% 50.2% 64.1% 44.6% 66.1% 37.7% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2010 61/61 9.3 3.7 63.1% 72.7% 51.7% 55.6% 42.5% 64.6% 38.0% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2011 53/54 7.8 3.6 63.9% 73.1% 50.9% 60.4% 42.6% 65.1% 38.9% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2012 28/28 7.1 4.3 64.4% 72.1% 47.2% 56.4% 48.2% 62.6% 39.0% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2013 55/55 7.7 3.7 66.0% 71.4% 48.6% 61.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.9% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2014 47/47 8.6 4.1 64.7% 74.7% 50.5% 56.6% 41.9% 66.2% 40.1% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2015 51/51 8.9 3.0 64.2% 73.5% 52.3% 70.1% 42.6% 65.9% 38.1% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 2016 56/61 8.2 2.9 64.2% 75.6% 53.1% 55.6% 50.1% 67.3% 40.4% 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 2017 34/34 9.1 4.0 62.8% 72.9% 50.7% 59.3% 42.7% 64.8% 38.9% 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 2018 48/50 7.8 4.4 66.5% 70.8% 49.9% 58.4% 48.9% 63.4% 36.9% 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 2019 55/57 6.8 4.0 65.1% 72.1% 51.4% 62.8% 42.0% 64.6% 39.4% 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 2020 21/21 6.3 3.7 67.2% 70.5% 49.2% 54.1% 44.1% 63.9% 40.1% 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 2021 33/36 9.6 5.0 61.5% 75.8% 48.7% 58.1% 37.5% 65.3% 38.7% 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 2022 21/21 7.4 3.5 60.5% 75.0% 51.7% 57.6% 43.1% 65.7% 39.2% 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 2023 26/27 7.9 4.8 58.5% 75.2% 48.5% 64.3% 50.2% 64.2% 37.0% 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 2024 45/47 9.0 4.2 60.2% 74.2% 51.2% 58.8% 38.3% 65.1% 35.1% 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 2025 33/34 9.9 5.6 60.2% 75.5% 48.7% 58.2% 39.6% 64.8% 35.5% 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 2026 13/14 8.6 5.0 58.5% 73.5% 43.5% 62.0% 36.8% 60.7% 37.9% 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 916/939 8.3 3.8 62.1% 73.4% 50.1% 58.8% 43.6% 64.4% 38.2% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gael Monfils Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 2004 1541 108.8 -0.58 +0.57 0.922 48.3% +29 — — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 0–1 — +0.16 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 2005 1755 136.3 -0.97 +1.08 0.975 49.4% -9 -156 -166 51.7% -0.20 8–7 (53%) 11–4 (73%) — -0.34 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35
19 2006 1721 133.5 -0.81 +2.04 0.999 50.1% -49 -25 -128 51.0% +0.16 6–4 (60%) 9–11 (45%) — -0.10 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52
20 2007 1782 136.7 +1.42 -0.82 0.994 49.6% -153 +65 -178 54.1% +0.14 3–9 (25%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.33 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51
21 2008 1953 154.2 +0.73 +2.37 1.040 50.5% -67 -7 -277 60.3% +0.51 8–1 (89%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.32 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61
22 2009 2007 158.5 +2.40 +2.01 1.113 51.9% -18 -3 — 66.2% +0.91 11–6 (65%) 14–8 (64%) — +2.24 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90
23 2010 2066 159.3 +1.36 +1.81 1.073 51.1% +36 -91 -319 62.1% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 17–15 (53%) — +2.34 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85
24 2011 2002 157.4 +2.10 +1.95 1.116 51.8% +50 +13 -191 64.0% +0.69 10–6 (63%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.42 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00
25 2012 1939 150.3 +0.17 +1.43 1.041 50.6% +63 +20 — 60.9% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.02 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44
26 2013 1931 160.1 +0.59 +2.40 1.070 51.0% +14 +50 -85 59.3% +0.57 10–9 (53%) 13–13 (50%) — -2.90 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77
27 2014 2056 169.1 +2.56 +3.83 1.185 52.6% +23 -15 -229 68.8% +0.98 5–8 (38%) 12–6 (67%) — -2.40 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10
28 2015 1952 158.7 +2.29 +1.91 1.117 51.9% +17 +137 -63 63.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 18–10 (64%) — +1.11 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40
29 2016 2067 172.6 +3.30 +4.82 1.234 53.6% +18 +2 — 70.7% +1.23 6–8 (43%) 13–9 (59%) — +4.14 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22
30 2017 1970 155.7 +1.37 +2.55 1.105 51.7% +56 +25 -100 60.2% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.21 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59
31 2018 1919 155.3 -0.44 +1.41 1.011 50.2% +63 +5 +33 60.0% +0.50 11–10 (52%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.37 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72
32 2019 1926 160.8 +0.66 +3.33 1.112 52.2% +53 -1 -70 62.5% +0.96 16–6 (73%) 13–15 (46%) — +2.98 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58
33 2020 1937 153.8 +0.85 +2.39 1.109 52.2% +115 -125 — 71.4% +1.27 1–1 5–1 (83%) — +1.00 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68
34 2021 1896 147.8 +1.89 +1.74 1.115 51.6% +97 -123 -123 54.7% +0.32 4–8 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.47 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
35 2022 1927 151.1 +2.06 +2.54 1.144 52.4% +36 — — 72.3% +1.43 2–1 (67%) 6–0 (100%) — +1.36 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
36 2023 1928 151.8 +0.57 +1.80 1.035 50.5% +27 -154 — 58.2% +0.30 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.99 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39
37 2024 1904 154.2 +1.42 -0.11 1.005 50.2% +38 -180 -35 52.8% +0.20 9–9 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.36 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23
38 2025 1773 144.0 +0.03 -0.16 1.006 50.2% +87 -34 +34 52.0% +0.23 10–7 (59%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.00 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 2026 1683 128.7 -2.22 +0.70 0.965 49.8% +92 +5 — 41.7% -0.42 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.27 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 2169 163.2 +1.14 +1.96 1.074 51.2% +25 -8 -117 60.4% +0.58 165–138 (54%) 232–176 (57%) 104.0 +0.50 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.