H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 1-6

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–1 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2015 Monte Carlo Masters semifinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 39 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Tomas Berdych #8 6-1 6-4 Gael Monfils #18 Match data
Apr 1, 2015* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #9 6-3 3-2 (ret.) Gael Monfils #19 Match data
Feb 14, 2015* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-1 6-4 Gael Monfils #21 Match data
May 29, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Gael Monfils #81 7-6(8) 6-4 6-7(3) 6-7(4) 7-5 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
May 11, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tomas Berdych #7 6-1 6-1 Gael Monfils #14 Match data
Feb 5, 2012* Montpellier ATP 250 F Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 4-6 6-3 Gael Monfils #13 Match data
Mar 6, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #10 6-3 6-2 Gael Monfils #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gael Monfils #325 #6 3,815 2,151 569 356 61.5% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,753 0 1 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,781 0 1 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2008 27–16 62.8% #14 1,933 0 1 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 1,994 0 2 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,062 0 3 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 1,996 0 4 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,936 0 4 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,929 0 4 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,054 0 5 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,951 0 5 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10
29 2016 40–17 70.2% #7 2,052 0 6 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,966 0 6 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,921 0 7 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,920 0 8 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,934 0 10 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13
34 2021 19–16 54.3% #21 1,910 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,934 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,925 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2024 25–21 54.3% #55 1,895 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,771 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 3–7 30.0% #325 1,685 0 13 — — — — — — —