H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gael Monfils vs Wesley Moodie H2H: 1-1
Gael Monfils and Wesley Moodie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Wesley Moodie won the 2006 US Open second round 6-4 2-6 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Wesley Moodie | 6-4 2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | Gael Monfils | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2006* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Gael Monfils | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Wesley Moodie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gael Monfils | #325 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,151 | 569 | 356 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| Wesley Moodie | #1,149 | #57 | 664 | 1,746 | 47 | 65 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gael Monfils | Wesley Moodie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #14 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,062 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #63 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #162 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #7 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,920 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,934 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #21 | 1,910 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,934 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,925 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #55 | 1,895 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,771 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #325 | 1,685 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |