H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Galo Blanco vs Flavio Saretta H2H: 0-1
Flavio Saretta holds a 1–0 lead over Galo Blanco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flavio Saretta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Flavio Saretta won the 2003 Roland Garros third round 7-6(3) 6-2 2-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Flavio Saretta | 7-6(3) 6-2 2-2 (ret.) | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Flavio Saretta | #950 | #44 | 839 | 1,792 | 68 | 74 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Galo Blanco | Flavio Saretta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #98 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #111 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #118 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #188 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |