H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Galo Blanco vs Gaston Etlis H2H: 1-1
Galo Blanco and Gaston Etlis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on clay, while Gaston Etlis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Etlis won the 1997 Miami Masters first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1997* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Gaston Etlis | 6-4 6-4 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1996* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Gaston Etlis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gaston Etlis | #1,490 | #114 | 378 | 1,575 | 29 | 54 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Galo Blanco | Gaston Etlis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #133 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #197 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #132 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #168 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |