H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Galo Blanco vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0
Galo Blanco holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 1997 Prague third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1997* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Leander Paes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Galo Blanco | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |