H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Galo Blanco vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 1-0
Galo Blanco holds a 1–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Galo Blanco | 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(7) | Takao Suzuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Galo Blanco | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |