H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Galo Blanco vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0
Galo Blanco holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 2006 Barcelona second round 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2006* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-2 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Galo Blanco | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |