H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 0-2
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 2–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2017 Sao Paulo fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-4 7-6(5) | Gastao Elias | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2014* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,732 | 24 | 45 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |