H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Gastao Elias holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gastao Elias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gastao Elias won the 2016 Buenos Aires third round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2016* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gastao Elias | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2013* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | 6-2 6-4 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,732 | 24 | 45 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |