H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 0-1
Fabio Fognini holds a 1–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabio Fognini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2016 Umag semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2016* | Umag | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 6-3 6-3 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,732 | 24 | 45 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Fabio Fognini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 |