H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gastao Elias vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 0-1

Federico Delbonis holds a 1–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Federico Delbonis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2018 Argentina Open second round 7-6(5) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gastao Elias
Portugal Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Federico Delbonis #70 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Gastao Elias #114 Match data Feb 16, 2018* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gastao Elias #499 #57 831 1,738 24 45 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,898 158 196 44.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gastao Elias Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #578 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,455 0 0
20 2011 0–1 0.0% #172 1,455 0 0 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,551 0 0
21 2012 0–1 0.0% #139 1,365 0 0 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,715 0 0
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #175 1,519 0 0 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,748 0 0
23 2014 3–6 33.3% #132 1,658 0 0 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,659 0 1
24 2015 0–2 0.0% #133 1,542 0 0 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,693 0 1
25 2016 12–13 48.0% #81 1,681 0 0 2016 24–23 51.1% #41 1,752 0 2
26 2017 5–11 31.2% #115 1,648 0 0 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,810 0 2
27 2018 2–6 25.0% #263 1,551 0 0 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,722 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,715 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,671 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,598 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gastao Elias Federico Delbonis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — —
22 2013 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2014 2 12 14 14.3% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 14 24 41.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
27 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 1 4 5 20.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 5 6 16.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 10 10 0.0% 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 4 14 18 22.2% 20 28 48 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — 25 71 96 26.0% 133 113 246 54.1% 0 12 12 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 67/69 of Gastao Elias's and 352/354 of Federico Delbonis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gastao Elias Federico Delbonis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 28.3% 53.3% 39.5% 50.0% — 43.4% 27.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1/1 4.0 3.0 47.3% 48.6% 59.0% 28.6% 60.0% 54.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 2.0 1.0 59.7% 62.5% 48.1% 28.6% 33.3% 56.7% 39.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.5 4.0 51.0% 65.3% 51.2% 42.5% 100.0% 58.0% 30.6%
20 2011 1/1 4.0 5.0 58.2% 75.5% 39.5% 50.0% 57.1% 60.4% 41.3% 2011 5/5 2.6 2.6 55.3% 72.4% 57.3% 71.3% 49.8% 65.7% 42.1%
21 2012 1/1 3.0 7.0 55.2% 69.0% 46.8% 64.3% 75.0% 59.0% 32.1% 2012 15/15 2.6 2.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.7% 57.0% 45.9% 63.6% 38.8%
22 2013 5/5 1.2 3.0 50.3% 61.6% 51.4% 62.6% 59.0% 56.5% 35.7% 2013 20/20 3.3 3.0 60.5% 71.8% 53.1% 65.2% 39.5% 64.6% 36.0%
23 2014 9/9 5.7 3.0 49.1% 67.0% 45.8% 61.0% 40.2% 55.5% 38.9% 2014 47/47 4.1 2.6 62.4% 71.1% 53.2% 58.2% 37.9% 64.5% 36.0%
24 2015 2/2 3.0 4.0 49.0% 68.5% 55.0% 37.5% 36.7% 61.7% 36.0% 2015 33/33 3.3 3.8 59.1% 68.0% 49.7% 53.1% 40.0% 60.5% 37.1%
25 2016 23/25 3.8 2.1 53.0% 68.6% 53.4% 53.6% 46.3% 61.4% 37.5% 2016 46/47 5.0 3.8 57.7% 72.7% 53.6% 54.7% 42.5% 64.7% 37.9%
26 2017 16/16 4.1 3.0 52.7% 72.4% 48.2% 53.0% 32.6% 60.9% 34.5% 2017 21/21 2.9 3.1 62.0% 69.3% 53.0% 58.4% 38.9% 63.1% 36.6%
27 2018 8/8 2.8 4.1 53.7% 68.2% 44.7% 47.6% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2018 29/29 3.3 3.8 60.7% 68.1% 50.9% 59.1% 37.8% 61.4% 37.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/34 3.5 4.4 61.8% 67.3% 49.9% 55.2% 45.3% 60.6% 37.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 21/21 3.9 4.1 62.0% 69.7% 47.0% 59.5% 31.9% 60.8% 36.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 47/48 3.0 3.3 62.9% 67.9% 48.5% 58.5% 39.7% 60.8% 38.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 29/29 3.2 3.3 65.7% 65.9% 46.5% 52.3% 52.0% 59.2% 33.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 2.0 5.0 60.7% 63.1% 57.1% 66.7% 49.4% 61.2% 40.5%
Career — 67/69 3.8 2.9 51.8% 68.3% 49.5% 53.6% 42.1% 59.2% 36.5% — 352/354 3.6 3.4 61.3% 69.3% 50.8% 57.1% 41.5% 62.2% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gastao Elias Federico Delbonis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2006 1493 94.3 -1.30 +0.13 0.493 36.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1461 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1417 95.1 -3.92 -0.12 0.884 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1441 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1531 104.9 +1.54 +1.69 0.900 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22
19 2010 1454 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1455 98.1 -1.64 -4.62 0.728 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 2011 1455 98.1 -0.65 -1.19 1.044 50.8% — — — — — — — — +0.17 2011 1551 118.9 +1.25 +1.71 1.229 53.8% — +96 — 63.6% +1.55 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
21 2012 1366 97.0 +1.14 -2.10 0.784 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12 2012 1716 134.1 +0.78 +0.82 1.066 51.0% — +108 — 42.4% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 0.00
22 2013 1519 115.9 -2.88 +0.45 0.820 46.7% — +51 — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 2013 1748 139.4 +1.43 -0.37 1.017 50.3% -261 +198 — 56.3% +0.02 3–1 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 107.0 -0.16
23 2014 1659 124.7 -3.30 -0.67 0.874 47.4% — +53 — 36.4% -1.23 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09 2014 1659 139.9 +0.59 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -187 +188 — 43.9% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 6–14 (30%) 92.5 +0.52
24 2015 1542 102.1 -0.77 -1.80 0.939 48.3% — — — 37.5% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.12 2015 1694 141.9 -2.55 +0.99 0.939 48.9% -227 +164 — 44.4% -0.62 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 102.2 -1.35
25 2016 1682 137.4 -1.35 +0.32 0.972 49.5% -192 +187 — 46.6% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 103.0 -0.18 2016 1752 151.4 +0.81 +1.24 1.074 51.0% -113 +125 — 50.8% +0.09 8–11 (42%) 14–13 (52%) 101.9 +0.29
26 2017 1648 126.9 -2.22 -0.56 0.882 47.4% -120 +116 — 35.7% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.1 -0.37 2017 1810 146.8 -0.28 -0.65 0.992 49.8% -88 +44 — 48.9% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 104.7 -0.11
27 2018 1552 109.6 -2.57 -0.56 0.848 46.7% — +155 — 26.3% -1.26 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2018 1722 141.7 -1.88 +0.36 0.963 49.3% -54 +64 — 39.7% -0.44 3–7 (30%) 6–9 (40%) 92.3 -1.63
28 2019 1541 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1687 143.1 -2.47 +0.35 0.941 48.8% -62 +160 — 42.7% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 6–15 (29%) 94.2 +0.44
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1706 134.9 -1.28 -1.40 0.926 48.8% -73 +115 — 45.3% -0.43 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 -0.54
30 2021 1557 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1716 141.7 -1.58 +1.20 0.991 49.7% -195 +201 — 47.1% -0.02 10–5 (67%) 7–12 (37%) 100.2 +1.51
31 2022 1542 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1671 132.0 -3.23 -1.65 0.828 47.0% -137 +96 — 33.3% -1.01 2–5 (29%) 1–6 (14%) 90.2 -0.76
32 2023 1541 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1599 111.2 +1.18 -0.42 1.044 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 1–1 — -0.12
33 2024 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1738 120.9 -2.05 -0.25 0.895 47.9% -163 +130 — 37.5% -0.83 9–14 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 97.6 -0.62 — 1898 145.2 -0.88 +0.15 0.979 49.6% -142 +141 — 45.0% -0.25 51–62 (45%) 69–91 (43%) 92.9 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.