H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gastao Elias vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 0-2

Leonardo Mayer holds a 2–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Mayer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2018 Sao Paulo round of 32 5-7 7-6(10) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gastao Elias
Portugal Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Mayer #49 5-7 7-6(10) 7-6(5) Gastao Elias #102 Match data Mar 1, 2018* R32 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Leonardo Mayer #148 4-6 6-4 6-4 Gastao Elias #79 Match data Feb 16, 2017* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gastao Elias #499 #57 831 1,738 24 45 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gastao Elias Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #578 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 0–1 0.0% #172 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 0–1 0.0% #139 1,365 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #175 1,519 0 0 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0
23 2014 3–6 33.3% #132 1,658 0 0 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2015 0–2 0.0% #133 1,542 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0
25 2016 12–13 48.0% #81 1,681 0 0 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0
26 2017 5–11 31.2% #115 1,648 0 0 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0
27 2018 2–6 25.0% #263 1,551 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gastao Elias Leonardo Mayer
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2013 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 4 14 18 22.2% 20 28 48 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 67/69 of Gastao Elias's and 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gastao Elias Leonardo Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 28.3% 53.3% 39.5% 50.0% — 43.4% 27.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1/1 4.0 3.0 47.3% 48.6% 59.0% 28.6% 60.0% 54.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1/1 4.0 5.0 58.2% 75.5% 39.5% 50.0% 57.1% 60.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1/1 3.0 7.0 55.2% 69.0% 46.8% 64.3% 75.0% 59.0% 32.1% 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8%
22 2013 5/5 1.2 3.0 50.3% 61.6% 51.4% 62.6% 59.0% 56.5% 35.7% 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7%
23 2014 9/9 5.7 3.0 49.1% 67.0% 45.8% 61.0% 40.2% 55.5% 38.9% 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4%
24 2015 2/2 3.0 4.0 49.0% 68.5% 55.0% 37.5% 36.7% 61.7% 36.0% 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3%
25 2016 23/25 3.8 2.1 53.0% 68.6% 53.4% 53.6% 46.3% 61.4% 37.5% 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1%
26 2017 16/16 4.1 3.0 52.7% 72.4% 48.2% 53.0% 32.6% 60.9% 34.5% 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2%
27 2018 8/8 2.8 4.1 53.7% 68.2% 44.7% 47.6% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5%
Career — 67/69 3.8 2.9 51.8% 68.3% 49.5% 53.6% 42.1% 59.2% 36.5% — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gastao Elias Leonardo Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2006 1493 94.3 -1.30 +0.13 0.493 36.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1461 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1417 95.1 -3.92 -0.12 0.884 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1441 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1454 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1455 98.1 -0.65 -1.19 1.044 50.8% — — — — — — — — +0.17 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1366 97.0 +1.14 -2.10 0.784 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 2013 1519 115.9 -2.88 +0.45 0.820 46.7% — +51 — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83
23 2014 1659 124.7 -3.30 -0.67 0.874 47.4% — +53 — 36.4% -1.23 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68
24 2015 1542 102.1 -0.77 -1.80 0.939 48.3% — — — 37.5% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.12 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
25 2016 1682 137.4 -1.35 +0.32 0.972 49.5% -192 +187 — 46.6% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.18 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
26 2017 1648 126.9 -2.22 -0.56 0.882 47.4% -120 +116 — 35.7% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.37 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11
27 2018 1552 109.6 -2.57 -0.56 0.848 46.7% — +155 — 26.3% -1.26 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33
28 2019 1541 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17
30 2021 1557 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32
31 2022 1542 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16
32 2023 1541 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77
33 2024 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
Career — 1738 120.9 -2.05 -0.25 0.895 47.9% -163 +130 — 37.5% -0.83 9–14 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 97.6 -0.62 — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.