H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 0-1
Nick Kyrgios holds a 1–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nick Kyrgios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 6-1 6-2 6-2 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,732 | 24 | 45 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |