H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Gastao Elias vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 1-0

Gastao Elias holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gastao Elias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gastao Elias won the 2016 Sao Paulo round of 32 1-6 6-4 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gastao Elias
Portugal Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gastao Elias #140 1-6 6-4 0-0 (ret.) Pablo Andujar #70 Match data Feb 25, 2016* R32 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gastao Elias #499 #57 831 1,738 24 45 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gastao Elias Pablo Andujar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #578 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 0–1 0.0% #172 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 0–1 0.0% #139 1,365 0 0 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #175 1,519 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0
23 2014 3–6 33.3% #132 1,658 0 0 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0
24 2015 0–2 0.0% #133 1,542 0 0 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0
25 2016 12–13 48.0% #81 1,681 0 0 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1
26 2017 5–11 31.2% #115 1,648 0 0 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2
27 2018 2–6 25.0% #263 1,551 0 0 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gastao Elias Pablo Andujar
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
22 2013 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
23 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — —
25 2016 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 4 14 18 22.2% 20 28 48 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 67/69 of Gastao Elias's and 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gastao Elias Pablo Andujar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 28.3% 53.3% 39.5% 50.0% — 43.4% 27.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1/1 4.0 3.0 47.3% 48.6% 59.0% 28.6% 60.0% 54.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1/1 4.0 5.0 58.2% 75.5% 39.5% 50.0% 57.1% 60.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1/1 3.0 7.0 55.2% 69.0% 46.8% 64.3% 75.0% 59.0% 32.1% 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0%
22 2013 5/5 1.2 3.0 50.3% 61.6% 51.4% 62.6% 59.0% 56.5% 35.7% 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0%
23 2014 9/9 5.7 3.0 49.1% 67.0% 45.8% 61.0% 40.2% 55.5% 38.9% 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6%
24 2015 2/2 3.0 4.0 49.0% 68.5% 55.0% 37.5% 36.7% 61.7% 36.0% 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0%
25 2016 23/25 3.8 2.1 53.0% 68.6% 53.4% 53.6% 46.3% 61.4% 37.5% 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6%
26 2017 16/16 4.1 3.0 52.7% 72.4% 48.2% 53.0% 32.6% 60.9% 34.5% 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4%
27 2018 8/8 2.8 4.1 53.7% 68.2% 44.7% 47.6% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8%
Career — 67/69 3.8 2.9 51.8% 68.3% 49.5% 53.6% 42.1% 59.2% 36.5% — 400/405 1.6 3.3 63.4% 64.3% 48.4% 53.8% 42.9% 58.4% 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gastao Elias Pablo Andujar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2006 1493 94.3 -1.30 +0.13 0.493 36.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1461 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1417 95.1 -3.92 -0.12 0.884 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1441 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1454 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1455 98.1 -0.65 -1.19 1.044 50.8% — — — — — — — — +0.17 2006 1500 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1366 97.0 +1.14 -2.10 0.784 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% — +64 — 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.13
22 2013 1519 115.9 -2.88 +0.45 0.820 46.7% — +51 — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% — +131 — 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.07
23 2014 1659 124.7 -3.30 -0.67 0.874 47.4% — +53 — 36.4% -1.23 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% — +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.7 -0.45
24 2015 1542 102.1 -0.77 -1.80 0.939 48.3% — — — 37.5% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.12 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 — 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.0 +0.67
25 2016 1682 137.4 -1.35 +0.32 0.972 49.5% -192 +187 — 46.6% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 103.0 -0.18 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 104.8 +1.11
26 2017 1648 126.9 -2.22 -0.56 0.882 47.4% -120 +116 — 35.7% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.1 -0.37 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 — 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) 102.9 +2.10
27 2018 1552 109.6 -2.57 -0.56 0.848 46.7% — +155 — 26.3% -1.26 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 — 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) 95.1 +0.42
28 2019 1541 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) 92.0 -0.85
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 98.0 -1.10
30 2021 1557 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 — 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 — -0.18
31 2022 1542 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1541 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% — +129 — 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.39
33 2024 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 — 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 106.5 -0.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 — 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 -0.16
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 — 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.4 -0.40
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 — 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.4 +1.21
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.23
Career — 1738 120.9 -2.05 -0.25 0.895 47.9% -163 +130 — 37.5% -0.83 9–14 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 97.6 -0.62 — 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.